ADDENDUM TO 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00940 

 COUNSEL: 

 HEARING DESIRED: YES 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His narrative reason for separation (Attrition, Unsuitability – 
Character and Behavior Disorders) be removed. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

A similar appeal was considered and denied by the Board on 
22 October 2009. For an accounting of the facts and 
circumstances surrounding the applicant’s appeal and the 
rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of 
Proceedings at Exhibit F. 

 

In December 2009, the applicant requested reconsideration; 
however, the Board staff determined his request did not meet the 
criteria for reconsideration. 

 

The applicant submitted a DD Form 149, dated 1 February 2010, 
with attachments, again requesting reconsideration of his case. 
He indicates his character disorder and behavior disorder are 
medical assessments and violate his privacy by being placed on an 
official document. He provides a letter from his clinical 
psychologist. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit G. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

We have thoroughly reviewed the evidence of record and considered 
the weight and relevance of the additional documentation provided 
by the applicant, and whether or not it was discoverable at the 
time of any previous application. However, since no new and 
relevant evidence has been provided, we find the request does not 
meet the criteria for reconsideration. As the applicant has been 
previously advised, reconsideration is provided only where newly 
discovered relevant evidence is presented which was not available 
when the application was submitted. Further, the reiteration of 
facts we have previously addressed, uncorroborated personal 


observations, or additional arguments on the evidence of record 
are not adequate grounds for reopening a case. Therefore, in 
view of the above and in the absence of new and relevant 
evidence, we find no basis to reconsider the applicant’s request. 

 

4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not 
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel 
will materially add to our understanding of the issues involved. 
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2009-00940 in Executive Session on 7 December 2010, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 

 

 

The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2009-00940 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit F. Record of Proceedings, dated 16 November 2009, 

 w/atchs. 

 Exhibit G. DD Form 149, dated 1 February 2010, w/atch. 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair